Check the proposed action
Review injection, sensitive disclosure, actions outside the authorized scope and attempts to persist untrusted instructions. Ordinary source reads do not trigger a review.
XVI.Release 0.16 · instruction security
Scoped review / redacted evidence / useful continuation
The optional stolz-guard skill reviews a prompt on request or a concrete untrusted instruction before action. It identifies a risky instruction, explains its consequence and keeps the authorized task moving.
§ 1stolz-guard
Review injection, sensitive disclosure, actions outside the authorized scope and attempts to persist untrusted instructions. Ordinary source reads do not trigger a review.
Report the source, a short redacted fragment, the consequence and a concrete next action. A matching hash identifies content; it cannot grant permission.
Reject the unsafe instruction and continue authorized work. Respect permission already given; ask only for missing information or authorization needed for a remaining action.
§ 2verification
An independent reviewer identified eight attack cases, left five benign cases unflagged and requested the missing recipient in one case. Package update, recovery and rollback were checked from the real v0.15.0 archive.
A skill review does not enforce tool permissions or guarantee detection. Managed profiles install five optimization skills; install guard separately. This release makes no new model, live-routing or token-saving claim.